The White Man March? Pffft…

Poster for the White Man March

I told myself I wasn’t going to bother dealing with this. I saw it as a non-issue. I saw it as a tired-ass joke. And besides, many people have already weighed in on the laughing stock known as the White Man March.

In case you haven’t heard, and no one would blame you, a white guy named Kyle Hunt who started this “movement” on behalf of the white male, presumably a burdened group in today’s world where diversity is threatening their existence. I’m not making this up, ya’ll! Hunt organized a march for all white men to (I guess) fight against the oppression and genocide on March 15.

From what I’ve heard, only tens of people participated. I dunno which is funnier: the fact there are actually white people who believed and marched along with this clown or that it only attracted a mere handful. Either way, people around the world have split their sides hearing about this nonexistent movement. The punchline is more than obvious as illustrated by Twitter’s humorous reactions under the hashtag #whitemanmarchprotestsigns.

White people feeling they are now under the boot of subservience is not news. A recent study reveals they believe they are experiencing racism more than blacks. It makes ya wonder what they consider as “racism”.

Some white people think that if you work as a waiter and a black customer doesn’t leave you a tip, that’s racist. Some whites think that not being accepted into that one college they desperately want to get in is racist. I’ll go even further. You have rich white men equate being criticized about their ever-expanding wealth is the same about getting lynched. Really!

Kyle Hunt, organizer behind the White Man March

As for Kyle Hunt, his 83 followers worldwide and their alternate reality view of the world, nice try. Some obvious racists think that the movement succeeded. Although, they never fully explained how exactly. Then again, white supremacists hate being wrong, even though 99% of the time, they are.

Ladies and gentlemen, I see white racists, race realists and all other white haters crying and whining about being collectively downtrodden as douchebags who are begging to be oppressed, not because they want to know how it feels to be the “other”, but because they are rebels without a legitimate cause or a clue. After all, they think Jews are a race, not those who practice a religion.

They hate anyone who’s not straight, white, male and Christian, and I use the last category loosely. They want people to feel sorry for them, because their lives suck. They believe the rest of the world is after the extinction of white genes. That’s why they’re obsessed with crime stats. They are their so-called “causes”. They give them an excuse to consider themselves and their people as victims.

This dude Kyle Hunt was probably a victim of something in the past. And like so many with the same reasoning, have transformed his victimization into a global calamity against the white race which ended up creating jokes and memes by those who are members of groups who are actually struggling from a little known problem we like to call ‘systematic white racism’.

Just a few tweets in response to the White Man March
Advertisements

94 thoughts on “The White Man March? Pffft…

  1. Thanks for the laugh brothawolf. I got a huge laugh out of these fools 10 man march. Though I will say I find race realist to be wrong 99% of the time.

  2. Yurugu is feeling, slightly, the sins of his twisted, diseased, diabolical past, present and future with rising alarm. Having zero concept of karma, they are “stunned” and “caught off guard” as to why the entire Colored world harbours feelings of resentment and anger towards them.

    Being deficient of melanin, the God Principle of the planet, they are unable to experience remorse and humility. They know, intrinsically, that they shall reap the benefits of what they have planted but arrogance will never permit them to admit it.

    Their rising fear will manifest into more crimes against us and more laws restricting us but it will be of no avail. Yurugu WILL PERISH off the planet. Either by ways of the sword or by ways of Mother Nature. My wish is for a solar assassination of their nasty, beastiality-loving, pale asses.

    By fuckers.

    Don’t let the door hit ya on the way out!

    On second thought…I hope the door hits them real hard.

  3. I was laughing so hard when I read this article. White Man March? White men are the privileged ones in society whether they are rich, poor or middle class. Now they are getting scared because President Obama is in office so that make up all types of nonsense like this, reverse racism and shit like this to get others to sympathize with their ”plight” about ”losing” their rights to non White minorities. They are delusional in their racism and prejudice. In reality, they are scared that minorities are slowly doing better for themselves in society and fear losing their economic, social and political privileges and advantages too.

    They are going crazy.

  4. I for one appreciate #thewhitemanmarch for a number of reasons.
    1. It provided some of the best examples of ignorance and some of the funniest Twitter comments I have over seen.
    2. Misspelled signs, bad fashion, and stunningly ignorant rationale for why they think they are oppressed, and those who participated in the march effectively showed the entire world how clueless they really are.

  5. When confronted with the fact that the Nazis killed millions non Jewish Whites and many Nazi officers and troops were subordinates of each other due to cult devotion and fear, most “White Nationalists” do not flinch of falter from their most divine beliefs of Neo Nazism. Germany found itself having to rebuild for decades well into the early 90s because of the Third Reich. Remember many German and other European Nationalities had intertwined families that had Jewish and other ancestries considered non-Aryans. SS soldiers were many times forced to slaughter their own kin and disavow any association. When a dictator takes over sure instabilities will ensue. So given the facts, this way of thinking is sociopathic no matter how you look at it.

  6. When examining the media’s approach to such matters and what I was taught in school, the whole story is never told. It’s more or less stated in black and white terms when the key approach is to examining things in the grey. You have to remember “hate” is profitable and thus why things are the way they are.

  7. Well! This is surely an interesting post by Brotha Wolf!

    I had a comment or two about this piece on my own blog. However, Brotha Wolf has graciously UN-exiled me (I think) from his pages, so here I am!

    If I’m allowed to roam freely here, then while I’m free to roam here, I won’t copy BW’s content on my blog… but I will feel free to comment over there blog about what I find here.

    Let’s face it: I find rich fodder for comment here!

    If, indeed, brotha Wolf is true to his word, and I am allowed to comment freely here, then you will observe — if you are honest — that I never (except on rare occasions when I slip up, at which point I always own up to it and apologize) attack people, but rather I address ideas and thoughts.

    Whoever you are, you might be a very intelligent person, but that doesn’t mean in any way that you are immune from really dumb thoughts. If your thoughts are dumb, I will show you just how they’re dumb… but I won’t attack you as a person.. or your character, your intelligence, knowledge, experience, your feelings, desires, needs or anything else about you.

    I will, however, as mentioned above, be unsparing as to what you write.

    You all might be well-advised to try the same approach!

    Also, to save time, I will not respond to any elements of CoMIRSUS(LiMiR)MOMOPE (Search the term on my blog to understand what that means) in any of your posts directed toward me. However, unless it becomes too time-consuming, I will do you the service of showing you where you have committed any CoMIRSUS(LiMiR)MOMOPE so that you will be able to desist in the future.

    So, if, truly, I AM back, then it’s good to “see” you all once again! Let’s see how long this lasts.

    Oh, who am I?

    Several months back, you had the opportunity to meet a colleague of mine, a sweet, older black woman who came here, kicked gluteus maximi and took pseudonyms. This time, I’m the largish white dude who pestered Abagond a bit at his blog, before he proved unequal to the task of debating with me and banned me. I am xPraetorius, and I look forward to “conversing” with you again.

    Best,

    — x

    1. FOR NOW, you are free to comment, but only on this post, the one you copied and pasted on your blog. Actually, it’s another one of my posts that you’ve copied, pasted and deconstructed. So, consider this as a free pass.

      Also, I have not made one post about you.

      So, what tell everyone here what’s wrong with this article please.

    2. You don’t never shut da fuck up or use brevity in anything (convo/comments) do ya’?

      You have the most drawn out answers of any racist, white supremacist sympathizer. No worries. NO ONE reads that BS past the 3rd sentence. As you were caucasoid.

      1. Well, that was as moronic a comment as I’ve seen, Nat. Not that I expect anything else from you.

        Nat, if you were to contribute something that either makes sense or is at least semi-literate or has any substance to it, the world would stop spinning from the sheer shock of it.

        Best,

        — x

      2. Because Nat’s comment was stupid, and contained racial slurs. I was under no obligation to respond to something so moronic with something wise, so I settled for witty and ironic.

        I’m composing a reply to your longish reply on my blog. It’ll be up soon.

        Best,

        — x

      3. How was it stupid to you? What racial slurs? Instead of using names yourself, how about some explanations behind your comments?

        I knew sooner or later you would be writing a reply to my response. And I hope it will have more substance than your last ones.

      4. BW, BW, re-read Nat’s poor excuse for a comment.

        Here’s a snippet: “You have the most drawn out answers of any racist, white supremacist sympathizer. No worries. NO ONE reads that BS past the 3rd sentence. As you were caucasoid.”

        Is it acceptable, for example, for me to call you a “negroid?” No, it’s not. So I don’t, and I won’t.

        That you allow gratuitous racist slurs on your site, doesn’t speak well for you.

        It was stupid, because, obviously, it said nothing, and used gratuitous insults and racial slurs to say it.

        BW, you have a college education… use it to do some critical thinking once in a while.

        Oh, and many, many people read what I write, and are reading it at this moment. Let’s leave it at that. 🙂

        Best,

        — x

      5. How are any of those words you have in bold print, racist?

        How do you know what I find is acceptable or not. Besides, neither of those “-oid” words were created by us, don’t you know.

        It’s my blog, and I allow whatever I see fit, especially if it annoys you, for some reason.

        Nat Turner’s Revenge’s comment said a lot more than you’re willing to give credit for. The usual problem is that you REFUSE to understand what it is.

        I do have a college education, and I don’t need you to tell me to do some critical thinking. In fact, that’s what I’ve been doing. What’s your excuse?

        Probably in your mind, you have a lot of readers. It doesn’t seem like through comments alone, but then again, that doesn’t prove much. However, if your ego is based on how many clicks you have, you can have it. It doesn’t prove that you’re better than I am, nor does it mean that you’re always right about everything. Sure, my blog gets numerous clicks, but I’m not in it for popularity. I dunno about you, but I have other worries. And not one of them is being so concerned about what an average blogger says that he would almost monitor his articles talking about a subject he has considerable contempt for.

      6. That you allow gratuitous racist slurs on your site, doesn’t speak well for you.

        Sure it does asshole. Ever hear of your 1st ammendment, freedom of speech? Here is some free speech for you, fuck off!

        Is it acceptable, for example, for me to call you a “negroid?”

        Yes it is acceptable to call you caucasoid, which is tame. I prefer motherfucking nut sac personally.

      7. @BW — in answer to your post. Yes, “caucasoid” is a racial slur. I don’t care who coins an “-oid” word. It wasn’t you or I… if it’s a slur, it’s a slur. Man, BW, you have more irrelevant deflections up your sleeve than anyone except maybe Abagond!

        If you allow it, then you traffic in racist slurs, and you have nothing to say to anyone else who also might traffic in such scummy language.

        And, yes, I do know what you find acceptable and not. It’s not like you keep it hidden. It’s called a “blog” and it’s pretty much available to tanyone in the world with an internet connection.

        For example, you allow racist slurs on your web site. That speaks very ill of you, and I advise you to stop the practice.

        You also allow moronic, semi-literate personal attacks on your web site (eg, Herneith, above) and I advise you to stop that practice as well.

        You also allow and use language that might indicate that your educational attainment is lacking…

        Nat’s comment was illiterate. It said nothing that speakers or readers of English could logically glean from it.

        I truly don’t care how many readers you think I have. I don’t need readers… I need, and have, viewers. More than you probably could imagine. 🙂 I figure you are one of them, from time-to-time.

        You’ll notice that I never even hinted that I’m better than you in anything I’ve ever said or written. Why? I don’t believe it. I’m much nicer than you; that seems likely. Why? Because I’m not a racist. I don’t insult people. I don’t cuss them out. I don’t allow others to cuss others out on my blog.

        As regards your “critical thinking,” should I give you the real rundown about some of your conclusions? Things like all white people are racists? Things like that wouldn’t pass for critical thinking in third grade. How about your constantly saying things that are obviously false? Things like telling others what white people think? Are you, indeed, a white person, BW? If not, then you can’t possibly tell anyone what white people think, unless they tell you. Again, a third-grader would understand that.

        I have no doubt about your ability to produce critical thought, but you haven’t, publicly at least, shown any inclination to do so.

        Best,

        — x

      8. I don’t deflect. I face it head on. You’re deflecting by turning the history of those words into an irrelevant matter, but that’s unintelligent to do so in any conversation.

        Like I said, this is my blog, and I don’t need you or anyone else to tell me how to run it or what to blog about. Period. If you have a problem with that, you can stop coming altogether and be done with it. But it seems you can’t or won’t, you being a control freak. Oh! I’m sorry. Is ‘freak’ a slur as well?

        Herneith is allow to comment on my blog if she wishes. She has never – NEVER disrespected me the way you have. (And I know you’ll deny ever saying anything deplorable or condescending giving your implied sociopathic traits.) But you, on the other hand, disrespect other commenters, and you are obsessed with discrediting me with baseless assumptions.

        So far, you have brought nothing of substance to prove me wrong in anything I’ve said. All this is high school namecalling online with you masking it as constructive criticism. Anyone on the outside would see this and shake their heads at the amount on the neverending nonsense you leave behind. You continue to mouth off about how my readers and I are of lower intelligence. And this is due to the fact that you don’t agree with them? You really are showing your immature colors.

        Lastly, I never said that all whites are racists. That’s what YOU said. Again, you’re putting words into my mouth. Instead of constantly telling me how what I’ve written is false, how about back it up with with actual info. You using you as your own source is unacceptable. You are not some great oracle of knowledge as you may think you are. So, until you can come up with something actually substantial, do yourself a favor and quit coming here before you humiliate yourself further.

      9. Again, point-by-point:
        You said:

        I don’t deflect. I face it head on. You’re deflecting by turning the history of those words into an irrelevant matter, but that’s unintelligent to do so in any conversation.

        My reply:

        Yes, the history of the words is irrelevant. BW, your mystical, magical thinking is a mess. You ascribe magical powers to mere sounds meant to convey meaning. The meaning of the words changes with the passage of time until, yes, their provenance is absolutely irrelevant. Linguistics 101, BW. I speak three other languages fluently, and several others with a bit less familiarity… believe me, the origin or words, while fascinating, is irrelevant to their actual meaning today.

        And, yes, you deflect constantly… this odd game of “xPrae says white racism doesn’t exist” that you play is pure deflection. you’ve forced me to waste lots of time with that little canard.

        However, I’m patient, BW, very patient.

        You said:

        Like I said, this is my blog, and I don’t need you or anyone else to tell me how to run it or what to blog about. Period. If you have a problem with that, you can stop coming altogether and be done with it. But it seems you can’t or won’t, you being a control freak. Oh! I’m sorry. Is ‘freak’ a slur as well?

        My reply:

        I’m not telling you how to run your blog. Don’t put words in my mouth. However, if you allow racist slurs from your commenters, then it doesn’t speak well of you… please feel free to run your blog any way you wish to. Even if it makes you seem like a hypocritical nitwit.

        Please feel free to call me names whenever you want, if you need that to make yourself feel better. More mature people typically don’t need that kind of silliness.

        You said:

        Herneith is allow to comment on my blog if she wishes. She has never – NEVER disrespected me the way you have. (And I know you’ll deny ever saying anything deplorable or condescending giving your implied sociopathic traits.) But you, on the other hand, disrespect other commenters, and you are obsessed with discrediting me with baseless assumptions.

        My reply:

        To all appearances (<– Note the clause), Herneith is a despicable racist. I could be wrong, but her writing is pretty full of animosity toward me solely because my skin is white. Sorry… that’s a racist. Yes, she can comment on your blog all she wants. It still speaks poorly of you that you allow her reprehensible personal attacks on another commenter who disagrees with her. I’d never allow that on my blog. However, I know where it comes from, since you give yourself permission to attack me personally as well. You do prove pretty comprehensively that I’m just a nicer person than you. 🙂

        You do have one thing correct. I have very little respect for Nat, Herneith or “diary” … To all appearances (<– Note the clause), these three people are really ugly racists. None of them has ever posted an even slightly intelligent post that I've ever read. There is the occasional nugget in your stuff, BW… it’s what leads me to believe that you’re older than both Nat and Herneith.

        You said:

        So far, you have brought nothing of substance to prove me wrong in anything I’ve said. All this is high school namecalling online with you masking it as constructive criticism. Anyone on the outside would see this and shake their heads at the amount on the neverending nonsense you leave behind. You continue to mouth off about how my readers and I are of lower intelligence. And this is due to the fact that you don’t agree with them? You really are showing your immature colors.

        My reply:

        You’re floundering, BW. You will notice, if you re-read everything I’ve written, that I’ve never even hinted at the thought that I’m somehow smarter than you or anyone else. Read it well, BW: What I’ve written is, pretty obviously, more intelligent than what you’ve written. That’s really not debatable.

        Am I more intelligent than you? I have no idea under the sun. I’m not, as you can surely tell, in the habit of saying anything about things I have no clue about. To the contrary, I’m constantly fending off people– like you — telling me things they couldn’t possibly know. For example: you always telling me about what white people think, and know, and feel, and all that pseudo-intellectual flapdoodle you’re so fond of.

        You said:

        So far, you have brought nothing of substance to prove me wrong in anything I’ve said. All this is high school namecalling online with you masking it as constructive criticism. Anyone on the outside would see this and shake their heads at the amount on the neverending nonsense you leave behind. You continue to mouth off about how my readers and I are of lower intelligence. And this is due to the fact that you don’t agree with them? You really are showing your immature colors.

        My reply:

        This is a throwaway… no response needed. However, if you re-read, you will see that I engaged in no name-calling.

        Best,

        — x

      10. Yes, the history of the words is irrelevant. BW, your mystical, magical thinking is a mess. You ascribe magical powers to mere sounds meant to convey meaning. The meaning of the words changes with the passage of time until, yes, their provenance is absolutely irrelevant. Linguistics 101, BW. I speak three other languages fluently, and several others with a bit less familiarity… believe me, the origin or words, while fascinating, is irrelevant to their actual meaning today.

        And, yes, you deflect constantly… this odd game of “xPrae says white racism doesn’t exist” that you play is pure deflection. you’ve forced me to waste lots of time with that little canard.

        However, I’m patient, BW, very patient.

        You really are serious! So, I guess it doesn’t matter if I call you a crazy ass, warped, control obsessed, racist cracker with an overwhelming white paternalistic motif. Don’t get upset though, because the history of those words don’t matter, like you said. And by the way, I can curse on my own blog.

        I’m not the one who’s constantly copying and pasting other articles from other bloggers just to tear them down repeating the “white racism doesn’t exist” crap. You need to face reality and see how full of it you really are.

        I’m not telling you how to run your blog. Don’t put words in my mouth. However, if you allow racist slurs from your commenters, then it doesn’t speak well of you… please feel free to run your blog any way you wish to. Even if it makes you seem like a hypocritical nitwit.

        Please feel free to call me names whenever you want, if you need that to make yourself feel better. More mature people typically don’t need that kind of silliness.

        Then shut the fuck up about me allowing certain words on my blog. It’s that simple. But as usual, you double-talk and show your hypocrisy. And it shows in your responses.

        To all appearances (<– Note the clause), Herneith is a despicable racist. I could be wrong, but her writing is pretty full of animosity toward me solely because my skin is white. Sorry… that’s a racist. Yes, she can comment on your blog all she wants. It still speaks poorly of you that you allow her reprehensible personal attacks on another commenter who disagrees with her. I’d never allow that on my blog. However, I know where it comes from, since you give yourself permission to attack me personally as well. You do prove pretty comprehensively that I’m just a nicer person than you. 🙂

        You do have one thing correct. I have very little respect for Nat, Herneith or “diary” … To all appearances (<– Note the clause), these three people are really ugly racists. None of them has ever posted an even slightly intelligent post that I've ever read. There is the occasional nugget in your stuff, BW… it’s what leads me to believe that you’re older than both Nat and Herneith.

        First off, you don’t even know what the word “racist” means. Second, she’s not berating you just because you’re white. She’s calling you out because you’re being condescending and proud of it. Not to mention she has most likely encountered other whites like you, and she is understandably sick of it. Too bad you won’t understand where she’s coming from seeing as how you like to talk down to people instead of at them when they disagree, like a spoiled child.

        You’re floundering, BW. You will notice, if you re-read everything I’ve written, that I’ve never even hinted at the thought that I’m somehow smarter than you or anyone else. Read it well, BW: What I’ve written is, pretty obviously, more intelligent than what you’ve written. That’s really not debatable.

        Am I more intelligent than you? I have no idea under the sun. I’m not, as you can surely tell, in the habit of saying anything about things I have no clue about. To the contrary, I’m constantly fending off people– like you — telling me things they couldn’t possibly know. For example: you always telling me about what white people think, and know, and feel, and all that pseudo-intellectual flapdoodle you’re so fond of.

        If you’re not more intelligent than I am, act like it. Why not humble yourself and learn instead of telling others what to think? Why not just consider that what you know, or not know, about racism is grossly incorrect. Why not learn from the people who’ve been through it, instead of telling them what they’ve been through wasn’t racist. That’s a sign of being a first-class prick, and you seem to see no shame in it, just like a sociopath.

        Now, obviously you want to continue this little back and forth because you can’t stand me thinking for myself. You’ll prove it by responding with the same lines. If you plan to do that, you may as well give up. Your racism denial view of the world is insignificant in the face of reality. Deal with it.

      11. Again, point-by-point:

        You said:

        You really are serious! So, I guess it doesn’t matter if I call you a crazy ass, warped, control obsessed, racist cracker with an overwhelming white paternalistic motif. Don’t get upset though, because the history of those words don’t matter, like you said. And by the way, I can curse on my own blog.

        My reply:

        No, it doesn’t matter if you call me all those silly things. By all means, feel free to call me all those names if you wish. It doesn’t bother me a bit. You sound like a racist, hick, slack-jawed, drooling, mouth-breathing, IQ-deprived half-wit when you do it, but, that’s certainly your right. As you mentioned, it is your blog. You can certainly appear as much like a jackass as you wish. I, however, counsel against it. Try one time having some class, BW. Try one time not sounding like an uneducated, illiterate blockhead. Just see whether you can do it. You’re not an illiterate blockhead. Why do you write and sound like one?

        You said:

        I’m not the one who’s constantly copying and pasting other articles from other bloggers just to tear them down repeating the “white racism doesn’t exist” crap. You need to face reality and see how full of it you really are.

        My reply:

        You’ll note that since we’ve been having these nice chats I haven’t commented on any of your later sophomoric essays in my own blog. I’m a man of my word. I find it curious that you would exhort me to “face reality,” when you keep hallucinating that I’ve said that white racism doesn’t exist. That little mantra of yours is so delusional, you just have to be smoking something that is distancing your silly self from reality. 🙂 That distant from reality, you would think that those who disagree with you are far from reality. That’s self-evident.

        You said:

        Then shut the f*** up about me allowing certain words on my blog. It’s that simple. But as usual, you double-talk and show your hypocrisy. And it shows in your responses.

        My reply:

        Again, please feel free to sound as much like an under-educated moron as you wish. Are you an under-educated moron, BW? I don’t think so. Why don’t you demonstrate that you’re not. It’s actually pretty easy. Eliminate the dirty words, the personal attacks, the racial slurs, etc… Give it a try. Are you afraid to try?

        You said:

        First off, you don’t even know what the word “racist” means.

        My reply:

        Yes I do. Furthermore, I’ve heard your definition of racism. It’s wrong. Here’s the correct definition: “A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race” (From the dictionary. Friendly hint: you might try to use one from time-to-time.)

        You said:

        Second, she’s not berating you just because you’re white.

        My reply:

        Yes, she is. She’s berating me because I’m white, and because I challenge her addiction to her imaginary victimhood.

        You said:

        She’s calling you out because you’re being condescending and proud of it. Not to mention she has most likely encountered other whites like you, and she is understandably sick of it. Too bad you won’t understand where she’s coming from seeing as how you like to talk down to people instead of at them when they disagree, like a spoiled child.

        My reply:

        Nope. She’s “calling me out” because I’m white, and you know it. Neither you nor she nor I have any idea whether or not she’s encountered “other whites like me.” We’re a vastly diverse group, so there’s no possible way ever to know that. She’s sick of her imagined oppression. Here’s her most likely problem: she’s worried that her insecurities will be found out, and that she won’t have a real excuse for potential future failures. She’s likely young… her writing is very immature and stupid. You and I both know that she’s heard only that white people will hold her back all her life, and she has embraced the excuse prophylactically. She’s probably turned her future failure into an inevitability and she has her excuse all lined up. The white man did it! Her writing seems to make that pretty transparent.

        I am somewhat condescending from time-to-time — it’s a fault, I admit it. However, Herneith is most likely a hate-filled racist. Between you and me, I’d rather have my character flaw than hers, wouldn’t you?

        Furthermore, you — and Herneith — have nothing to say regarding my tone. I’ve been condescending — you’ve been vicious. Should I give you some examples? In this post alone, you said: (1) shut the f*** up, (2) called me a crazy a**, (3) called me warped, control obsessed, a racist cracker, a hypocrite a pr*** and paternalistic, as well as a sociopath. In THIS post alone, BW! In other posts of yours there are many more. There’s no shortage of whackadoodle insults you’ve directed toward me. Furthermore, you’ve frequently endorsed the racial slurs and vicious insults others have pointed at me.

        Face it, BW, you’ve treated me one whole heckuva lot worse than I’ve ever treated you. I’m not smarter than you, but I am one whole huge bunch nicer than you. Are you man enough to admit it? Are you man enough to grow up, to apologize and to stop?

        I was.

        Not sure whether you remember, but I did slip up once regarding you and, in a fit of pique, I called you an idiot. As soon as I recognized it, I immediately apologized to you — and publicly — on my own blog. So again, BW, are you man enough to recognize your own abuse of someone whose only offense is to disagree with you? Are you man enough to apologize publicly? If you’re not, then internally at least, you should be intelligent enough and self-aware enough to admit that you might be wrong about a whole bunch of other things as well.

        At this point, I’m not the only one asking you: Are you really nothing more than a cheap bully, BW? I believe better of you… why don’t you try to act like it?

        This is kind of a big moment for you, BW… this is an opportunity for real growth for you. Again, as happens so often in life, and especially in America, it’s your choice. Are you going to choose the path of growth? Of learning and greater awareness? Or are you going to continue in your comfortable ignorance?

        You said:

        If you’re not more intelligent than I am, act like it.

        My reply:

        I don’t understand what you mean here… am I supposed to dumb down what I write? That’d certainly be condescending!

        You said:

        Why not humble yourself and learn instead of telling others what to think?

        My reply:

        I’ve humbled myself many, many, many, many times. As I mentioned before, I used to believe as you do. I was wrong. I had to have a sufficiently open mind to be able to allow other views in, and to admit that I was wrong. It’s how I got to my current beliefs. Am I correct now? I think so, but that’s why I seek out others like you who disagree with me. And, if you re-read what I’ve written, you’ll see that I’ve never told you how to think. I would, however, encourage you to think for yourself. Your writing at this point is right in line, point-by-point-by-point-by-point with the slimebags atop the Race Grievance Industry. That would seem to indicate that your thinking is there as well.

        You said:

        Why not just consider that what you know, or not know, about racism is grossly incorrect.

        My reply:

        What I know about racism is most likely correct. That’s why.

        I’ve proven it. Here for example. In that series of exchanges, you will note that I documented thoroughly my premise. You should re-read it.

        You said:

        Why not learn from the people who’ve been through it,

        My reply:

        Why would you presume that I haven’t?

        You said:

        instead of telling them what they’ve been through wasn’t racist.

        My reply:

        I, of course, never said any such thing. I did say that anecdotes simply can not say anything about the greater society. Sorry, it’s just true. And, it’s kind of something we all learn in the third grade, BW.

        You said:

        That’s a sign of being a first-class pr***, and you seem to see no shame in it, just like a sociopath.

        My reply:

        So, since what you describe is exactly how you treat me, are you a first-class pr***, BW, or just a massive hypocrite? Is it really ok for you to abuse me, but not for me to call you on it? I gave you concrete examples of abuse — in this post alone — of which you are rather obviously guilty, all the while accusing me of being abusive. That’s just weird, and it certainly doesn’t put you in a good light, BW.

        You said:

        Now, obviously you want to continue this little back and forth

        My reply:

        Sure… I’m enjoying our little chat.

        You said:

        because you can’t stand me thinking for myself.

        My reply:

        If only you would think for yourself! Your writing bespeaks thinking that is so unbelievably pedestrian, conventional and, frankly, feeble, that you should be embarrassed to publish it.

        You said:

        You’ll prove it by responding with the same lines. If you plan to do that, you may as well give up. Your racism denial view of the world is insignificant in the face of reality. Deal with it.

        My reply:

        This was incoherent. If reality corresponds with what I say, as it mot likely does, then my “same lines” are still insignificant. To say the sky is blue corresponds perfectly with reality, but is insignificant… it does have the advantage of being… true.

        Best,

        — x

      12. @BW, something’s been bugging me, and I think I might have found the nub of it. You just might be right about something.

        Look, I love you like a brother. You know that, right? But, this thing that’s been nagging me at the back of my mind wouldn’t let me go ’til I found a way to express it. I hope I’ve managed to do it here.

        BW, you show a dogged will to retain one conclusion to the exclusion of all others, and despite mountains of evidence against it. This notion of yours? The impression that somehow I think that, as you say, “there is no white racism in America today.” Despite the well-documented fact that I’ve said many dozens of times>in your own blog! — that there is white racism out there, but not much, and that it’s not a big problem in America today. Yet, you seem unable to get this idea into your noggin, accusing me over and over and over and over and over and over and over again of insisting that there is no white racism in America.

        This accusation of yours is so crashingly dumb, so completely at odds with the thoroughly documented contrary truth (because I’ve repeated my point ad nauseum in your very own blog! 🙂 ), that it has left me scratching my head. I know you’re not that stupid! Yet, you keep saying that astonishingly stupid thing over and over and over and over again. In your last post, to which I responded in some detail, you repeated this obvious fiction three times!

        I could conceive of only two possible conclusions: (1) that you are intentionally playing an infantile game. (The RGI is notorious for this. For example, someone might say something perfectly innocent, and all of a sudden, out of the blue, he’s committed some newly-coined, grievous sin, exposing his once-hidden racism in coded language or some such nitwittery) or (2) you are selectively stupid.

        <b
        Not to worry, BW! I’m not name-calling here. We all do it. I’m absolutely selectively stupid about some things: my kids, for example, or the Red Sox. These are areas where I’m not prepared to be objective, and I admit it. In other words, about my kids or the Red Sox, I’m intentionally selectively stupid. I’ve been embarrassingly selectively stupid about several other things in my life as well, and I’m not afraid, if a bit embarrassed, 🙂 ) to admit it.

        In the case of my attitude toward my kids, it’s likely the right thing to be selectively stupid…they know they always have someone who unconditionally will do his level best to act in their best interests at all times. That’s a right and proper understanding for them to have…kind of like: “the sun will rise in the morning.” In the case of my selective stupidity concerning the Red Sox, it’s a fun little side interest, and causes harm to no one.

        You were able to construct in your mind a scenario in which the doofus Kyle Hunt, and his weird “White Man’s March” (Btw, that’s a better name for what he did: A “Weird White Man’s March.” 🙂 ) fits into a lager framework of all these other “racisms” you and the rest of the RGI have fabricated. You know: “institutional racism,” “color-blind racism,” “race realism,” “ghost racism,” (Oops — that one’s mine! 🙂 ), “under-every-rock-and-behind-every-tree racism” (Oops! Mine again!)…

        That was some pretty complex imagining there, BW! You’re obviously not stupid. So why, then, can’t you sometimes understand the plainest of English? That’s what has bugged me for some time.

        As I said above, either you’re playing a silly game, or you’re selectively stupid.

        I’ve come to the conclusion that you’re an honest man; that you say what you mean and you mean what you say; that what you write here is truly what you mean. Therefore, all that remains is to conclude that you are being selectively stupid.

        This could be understandable. I’m figuring you’ve spent many years wallowing in the bitterness and rancor that you display toward white people. You frequently rage against the fact that white people have ordered the country around their own interests. Well, why wouldn’t they?!? After all, they are the majority ethnicity in the country! When someone else becomes the majorty ethnicity — with a critical mass of numbers — as hispanics are heading toward, then they will order the country around what they perceive as their best interests.

        I’m guessing (<– key word) that you've spent so many years marinating in this hatred for white people, that when I come along and prove your entire world view to be wrong and misguided, your perfectly natural reaction would be one of selective stupidity. Some would call this “defensiveness,” or “hyper-defensiveness” (due to the over-the-top hostile reactions of ugly racists like Nat or Herneith). After all, such vitriol would be perfectly unnecessary if you were confident and sure of your beliefs.

        If, for example, you were so sure of the veracity of your beliefs, then it would be child’s play to pick apart my feeble efforts at gainsaying them, right? So, why do you have so much difficulty, and why the apparent need to be so incredibly defensive? The answer is easy: your fear that you might have been wrong, tempts you powerfully to be selectively stupid. After all, who ever wants to face the fact that they have been wrong for decades?!? This is exactly what the flat-earthers of the past had to deal with when faced with convincing evidence that the earth is round.

        Nowadays we look upon those selfsame flat-earthers as anachronistic throwbacks to a more ignorant time and age. This is the reality that you folks in the Race Grievance Industry face. You’re flat-earthers. Despite mountains of evidence right in front of your face, countering your belief that America is a racist hellhole, with barely concealed hostility behind every white face, you need to cling to your long-antiquated, long-disproven, long-gone beliefs. After all, they’ve animated your thoughts and actions for decades now. No one ever willingly gives up his long-held beliefs, especially, to admit he’s been wrong!

        Think back, again, to the flat-earthers of the long-ago past. They were just as defensive as you are today. So many who understood the earth to be round faced the same vitriolic, hostile hyper-defensiveness that you in the RGI exhibit today. The new, correct thinkers back then were “heretics!” They were “evil!” They had to be stopped! And, for a while, they were. But as back then, the correct thinkers will, one day, win out in America.

        So, back to the top. About what precisely were you right? You’ve long maintained that you were inadequate to the task of debating with me on your blog. You’ve said quite overtly that you’re not prepared to accept serious, countervailing input. Heck! You even have a regular feature called “Vern’s Venting.” Venting hardly constitutes a serious contribution to greater understanding of what’s all around us. And the Vern’s Venting feature is typically sophomoric, simplistic and moronic. In other words, you’re not a serious observer of the country, and I probably should try to find someone else with greater knowledge and a greater desire to understand and to trade knowledge and insights. I probably will. There is very little learning, depth or insight to be found in these pages.

        You are, as always, welcome at my blog … at any time, but I might not treat your “contributions” as seriously as I used to, so you might not get the attention you used to receive.

        One more quick thing, and I offer it as friendly advice. Selective stupidity is voluntary stupidity. You can just as easily rid yourself of this intentional stupidity as you can cling to it. I assume that you’re a bit older, BW, than the deeply ignorant Herneith and Nat and “diary” … their rather obvious stupidity can likely be chalked up to energetic, youthful ignorance and inexperience. However, you’re never too old to grow and progress. This is an opportunity for you, BW, to grow. It’ll be difficult, because you’ll have to make a conscious decision to toss off long-encrusted, misplaced and corrosive acrimony and resentment. However, you’ll be ever so much the better for it. I offer you this counsel as a friend.

        Best,

        — x

      13. Prae,

        Frankly, I’ll be honest. I’m too tired to respond to every single point, again. Don’t let it get to your head thinking that you’ve won, but if you do, so be it. I’m not in this to win, and I’m not going to waste anymore of my precious time on someone whose mind is made up. I’ve had enough.

        Say whatever you want. It doesn’t change anything. Unless, you know how it feels to be part of the “other” in this society, you can NEVER truly understand. Judging by your constant urge to consider it the eccentric ramblings of what you refer to as the Race Grievance Industry (RBI), why should I or anyone else try to argue on behalf of us? For that matter, why would anyone as sane as you claim to be try so hard to argue with someone like me?

        If you want to believe so hard that white racism is not as big an issue as I or others have made it out to be, fine. I can not prove to you that it’s a problem no matter how hard to try, because you’ve made up your mind. So, why continue this back-and-forth? It’s like trying to prove that sexism is a problem for women or homophobia is a problem for gays. If you are not willing to listen more and talk less, what’s the point?

        Like I said, I’m done. Go ahead and think that you’ve triumphed. It’s no skin off my nose. I’ll continue to know what I know, and that is I can not discount something that is so obvious. No amount of wishful thinking will cancel that.

      14. Brotha, enough with this comedy! xpratoria, you are full of shit. Brotha thanks for defending me. I generally do not engage white racist assholes except to mock and deride. If this fool cannot see this, then he is dumber than I thought.

      15. No problem. I know what you said was not racist in the least. And I know telling him so would be a waste of time, like it’s always been.

      16. And you’re a racist. Even if I’m delusional, I’d rather be that than a racist.

        That reads like something a petulant child would write. Carry on, your opinion has no bearing on my reality.

        Kisses, or is it best?

        XXX

      17. You may be right. “Racist” might be too kind a word for her. 🙂

        However, there’s no possibility of debate: she’s a racist; and your having allowed her to abuse an innocent commenter on your blog is reprehensible. You should be ashamed.

        Best,

        — x

      18. There you go, passing the blame. It’s funny how you seem to believe in personal responsibility, but doesn’t know what it means. For the record, I’m not ashamed of anything. Someone here should be ashamed and it’s not me nor is it Herneith.

        If you’re going to continue to whining for something you will never get in a million years, I may as well, from now on, send all your replies to the spam folder.

      19. Just a quick note concerning this:

        I hate to have to point out the obvious to you, BrothaWolf, but you have no idea under the sun just how “other” I am. You could have no way under the sun of knowing that. If you think that your skin color is the only way to be “other” in this country, or anywhere in the world, then you are very much mistaken. Trust me, I’m plenty “other.”

        I argue with you because I like you — despite the vitriol you direct against me. You might wonder why I should like you then. Fair question: Everyone in the RGI directs the very same hyper-defensive vitriol at me. Since I know that will be your approach, I never expected anything different. However, you have hung in there, and I admire that. Also, you’ve tossed the occasional nice comment out, in stark difference from the Nat’s or the Herneith’s or the “diary’s” on your blog, who want to paint me in the most lurid of terms, as some kind of degenerate, latent serial killer, awash in snarling hatred for all black people. In this way, your discourse was vastly superior to theirs, and I liked that. How couldn’t I like you? You’ve taught me things and given me understandings that I can bring back to my colleagues and that we can work with.

        As you probably know, my only interest is to learn. I have no desire to win. I wasn’t the one who turned it into a “competition.” I was originally here for learning and exchanging ideas and thoughts. That I stuck to my guns was what you and others turned into a competition. You even confessed to trying to trip me up and “expose my racist thinking.” You were unable to do that because I have no racist thinking.

        I think we’ve both covered as much ground as we’re going to be able to cover here in this particular instance. I hope you will allow me to contribute my thoughts to your blog as time goes on.

        Your friend,

        — x

      20. @BW, I do want to commend you specifically for something. It’s something important. You showed more courage than Abagond and several of the others whose blogs I have visited in the past few months. There has been not even the slightest hint that they would allow me back to comment on their blogs.

        You, however, had the courage to allow back someone who you knew would posit a robust and tenacious challenge to beliefs you hold dear. That’s no small thing, and you are to be commended for showing that courage.

        Several of my colleagues here at the PWG insisted that you’d never do it. They were wrong and the fact that you did, will make it into several media presentations — again anonymously — in upcoming weeks and months. Keep your eyes and ears open! (I can’t tell you which ones, because that will give away my identity. Trust me, I’m recognizable! 🙂 )

        Just so you know, you are the only member of the RGI ever to show that courage in our project the project that has been going on for more than a year, and that has contacted and debated and interacted with hundreds of RGI members.

        I’m pleased and gratified that I held out and proved them wrong in at least that part of their thinking.

        Best to you, my friend,

        — x

      21. I’m pleased and gratified that I held out and proved them wrong in at least that part of their thinking.

        You are delusional! Carry on!

      22. Maybe you missed the meaning of my post. Even if I were delusional, that’s a whole heckuva lot better than being a racist like Herneith.

        Look, this little tit-for-tat is silly. You and I know that Herneith and you have both admitted that if you were to encounter me on the street, having no idea who I am, you would dislike me immediately because of the color of my skin.

        Both you and Herneith are racists, and you know it.

        Best,

        — x

      23. Oh bullshit! Exactly point to me where I even so much as implied that I would hate you because you’re a white guy.

        You simply don’t want to process in your head that your skin color has an insignificant reason to dislike you. You acting pompous, argumentative, condescending and controlling has everything to do why we don’t really like you. As usual, you don’t want to see your own reflection given to you by others. Instead, you blame the whole world for being mean to you. Whether you like it or not, you are completely out of your mind.

      24. Continue to think what you want. It changes nothing, no matter how many times you try to tell me. The keyword is ‘tell’, not ‘convince’. All your arguments are based on the old ‘blame the victim’ strategy. This is why I have no respect for them.

      25. That’s a weird thing for you to say, BW. Since you’re not a victim, how could I blame you?

        I certainly don’t blame you for being a victim, BW, I blame you for being the aggressor! Your racism makes you, at this point, well and truly on the side of the wrong-doers. You are the one committing the wrong. You are libeling tens of millions of people by calling them racists, when the vast majority of them are not. And, you committed the wrong against me when you called me a racist, when I am not, in any way a racist.

        You owe me a humble apology, BW… I was willing to hold off on demanding one, because you and I appeared to be getting along better — until you let the racist Herneith muck things up again — but now I’m demanding one.

        I think you realize I’m not a racist, but on your very own blog, you allowed one of your “contributors” to libel me by accusing me of racism.

        What kind of a man are you, BW, that you would allow that kind of injustice to pass unanswered?!?

        I never would allow that kind of false accusation to pass unanswered on my web site. My web site is a racism-free zone… safe for all people of all races.

        I’m ready to accept your apology. 🙂

        Best,

        — x

      26. Apology?!? For what? For telling it like it is? For, in some way, offending you? For defending what I think and know?

        Now I know you must be crazy.

      27. For calling me, an innocent man, a racist. It’s the most toxic accusation that can be made today (though “homophobe” is catching up) and the accusation should never be made lightly. Yet you toss it around like fallen autumn leaves …. and you should be ashamed of yourself.

        Also, you allowed a commenter on your blog to abuse me with inappropriate language and the same obviously false accusation. By not chastising that commenter you indicated tacit agreement.

        That’s reprehensible, and you ought to be man enough to apologize.

        Whenever I do something inappropriate, I apologize immediately. It’s a sign of intelligence and maturity. You’re old enough to have gathered some of each of those qualities, and you need to man up and make right the wrongs you have done.

        Best,

        — x

      28. I will not take back what I saw with my own eyes. And calling you what you are is nothing compared to referring to groups with derogatory names filled with hate and ignorance. Your case for calling ‘racist’ an offensive term in itself is pointless. You can’t convince anyone that it should be derogatory because it in no way, shape or form based on hatred or ignorance. Only when it’s used by nutjobs like you is when it’s, minimally wrong and maximally ridiculous.

        I also get a laugh out of you crying about how you’re the victim. Yet, here you are coming back for more. Why not leave and not take this “abuse” if you feel offended? No one is making you stay here.

        Your problem is that you don’t think you’ve hardly done anything appropriate. Yes, I know you apologized for calling me a name on your blog, but that was the one and only time you ever said you’re sorry for…anything.

        Why should I apologize to you when you won’t apologize to me for all the crap you’ve unloaded? And yes, I told you what was wrong, and you sit there and continue to think you’re innocent. What if you slapped a woman (not saying you would), and she slaps you back, would you want her to apologize to you? No person with common sense would see any sense in that at all. But in your little world, it does.

        Your problem is plain and simple. You think what you said was hurtful. It’s your opinion. But you think what I’ve said was hurtful and you ask me to apologize. When you hurt or offend someone, it doesn’t matter if you thought what you said wasn’t offensive. The fact is that other people found it offensive, and some through another blog, have graciously explained why. Yet, you casted them down. You even call their replies stupid. Yet, when we fight back, as expected, you play the victim.

        So no, I will not apologize for me and I will not apologize on behalf of Herneith. She knows that kind of comments you leave, and to her, those are slaps across the face. Only when you learn to own up to your foolishness and apologize for the stuff you’ve said would there be a small chance of respect earned.

        You can not deny that it was you that started this back-and-forth since day one in that post about Paula Deen. But I know you will still try to paint yourself as innocent.

      29. @BW: I didn’t think you were man enough to admit you did wrong publicly. I’m content to know that you know in your heart that you did wrong. Your first paragraph is incoherent. I gather you think I’m mistaken.

        You then said:

        I also get a laugh out of you crying about how you’re the victim. Yet, here you are coming back for more. Why not leave and not take this “abuse” if you feel offended? No one is making you stay here.

        To which I reply:

        @BW: don’t get me wrong. I’m not offended. I’m urging you to apologize for your own good. Your jibes don’t bother me in the slightest. Again, it’s a bit like calling Shaquille O’Neal short. He’s not, and he’s sure of it, so such an accusation wouldn’t bother him in the least. No, you should apologize to get the stain of your abusiveness out of your life, and off your conscience. I give you that counsel only because I like you and we’re friends.

        You then said:

        Your problem is that you don’t think you’ve hardly done anything appropriate. Yes, I know you apologized for calling me a name on your blog, but that was the one and only time you ever said you’re sorry for…anything.

        To which I reply:

        This was incoherent. I gather that in your first sentence you meant inappropriate? If I take your paragraph as written, it’s wrong on the face of it. I’ve been completely appropriate here. I’ve never used foul language; I’ve never used racial slurs; I’ve kept my discourse completely civil, dignified and professional. I apologized on my blog because I called you an idiot. You are not an idiot. What you say is perfectly idiotic, but you are not an idiot. Furthermore, idiocy is the luxury of the intelligent, but the prison of the idiot. You choose to say the idiotic things you say. A real idiot has no such choice. In many ways, what you do is worse than the idiot, who never chose to be an idiot.

        You then said:

        Why should I apologize to you when you won’t apologize to me for all the crap you’ve unloaded? And yes, I told you what was wrong, and you sit there and continue to think you’re innocent. What if you slapped a woman (not saying you would), and she slaps you back, would you want her to apologize to you? No person with common sense would see any sense in that at all. But in your little world, it does.

        To which I reply:

        @BW, @BW, @BW… we’ve been through this. I did apologize when I called you an idiot. As to your example, it’s an interesting hypothetical. I’d never slap a woman unprovoked — I’d never slap anyone unprovoked… However, since it’s your hypothetical, I’ll play by your rules. The only reason I’d ever slap a woman is if she did something to me that would merit such an act. The only act that would merit such a response would be some unwarranted physical act of hostility directed toward me. So, in your hypothetical, a woman has committed a physical act of hostility toward me, and I have slapped her. If I then were to discover that I was in the wrong, I would immediately apologize to her, whether or not she slapped me back. If, however, she were in the wrong — ie, she did commit an unprovoked act of physical hostility toward me, then, yes, I’d demand at least an apology from her. I might demand further redress as well, depending on what it was that she did to me.

        BW: I do understand your hypothetical: you’re claiming victim status, when you’re the aggressor. To fill in the roles: you’re the woman who committed the unwarranted act of aggression directed at me — the scurrilous accusation of racism. I’m the dude who didn’t stand for it, and — verbally at least — slapped you right back. You needed that slap. I’m guessing that no one else has ever stood up to your on-line bullying before?

        However, my slap was a slap of assistance to you. Your attack against me didn’t hurt or offend me in any way — you shouldn’t be overly aggrieved at this: the bullying you did was first rate bullying — I’m just nearly impossible to offend. Our online tussles might not be overly fair in that regard, because you seem very thin-skinned.

        You then said:

        Your problem is plain and simple. You think what you said was hurtful. It’s your opinion. But you think what I’ve said was hurtful and you ask me to apologize. When you hurt or offend someone, it doesn’t matter if you thought what you said wasn’t offensive. The fact is that other people found it offensive, and some through another blog, have graciously explained why. Yet, you casted them down. You even call their replies stupid. Yet, when we fight back, as expected, you play the victim.

        To which I reply:

        Again, I have no idea what this means. I do not think that what I said was hurtful. Rather, it was educational. What you said to me harmed you, not me. It didn’t bother me in the least. You have to live with it on your conscience, I don’t. Other people found what I said to you offensive? They need to mind their own business. The opinions of Herneith, Nat and “diary” are those of racists who fantasize openly about the violent deaths of more than a billion people who look like me. I’d never be bothered by their opinions. You shouldn’t either. And you should hang around with a better sort of person. You did have a real funny in there, though, BW. No one on your blog ever once came even close to interacting with me in anything even remotely resembling a “gracious” way. That one gave me a serious chuckle.

        You then said:

        So no, I will not apologize for me and I will not apologize on behalf of Herneith. She knows that kind of comments you leave, and to her, those are slaps across the face. Only when you learn to own up to your foolishness and apologize for the stuff you’ve said would there be a small chance of respect earned.

        To which I reply:

        Just quickly on this one. I expect you to apologize only for yourself. Herneith needs to apologize on her own behalf. She won’t though. If Herneith considers what I wrote here to be “slaps across the face,” then she is overly sensitive. However, I know that to be the case anyway. Her obscenity-laden attempts at bons mots are perfect indicators of this. But she’s young. She might yet grow up, though things are not looking up in that regard.

        You then said:

        You can not deny that it was you that started this back-and-forth since day one in that post about Paula Deen. But I know you will still try to paint yourself as innocent.

        To which I reply:

        Soooooo, let me see: you wrote a bone-headed essay about Paula Deen, published it for all the world to see, apparently expected nobody to disagree with your incandescent wisdom, then when someone did disagree with you, you falsely accused her (my colleague who first interacted with you here) of racism, and you think I started all this? That is funny!

        @BW, I’m thinking of doing this differently. I’m thinking of starting a feature on my blog called “Otha WolfHowling With Laughter at the Nitwittery of the Race Grievance Industry.” I know, I know… it’s a bit unwieldy, but I can wordsmith it. (You know I can 🙂 ) It’d be a whimsical little thing that would poke fun at the sillinesses that you in the RGI publish all the time. I get such great material from so many of your commenters. I’ll attribute the inspiration to you, of course. Then we can debate blog against blog. I’m certain that — if you’re confident of all you say — this would represent a delightful little challenge for you! What do you think?

        Best,

        — x

      30. You must really have a lot of time on your hands to write this, all just to get me to say ‘I’m sorry’ to you and rethink my stance on the whole racism thing. Wow.

        Aside from the grammatical and spelling errors of my last response, you should know what I mean. If you really feel the need to point them out, you obviously are obsessed with trying to discount what I’ve said. I digress.

        I already mentioned how you DID apologize for calling me a name. That was it. But since day one, YOU CAME TO MY BLOG.

        How is apologizing to you a good thing for me? What should I apologize for? I didn’t start this sad little war. I didn’t comment on your blog first. You threw the first punch. I defended myself while you kept throwing more blows. It’s nothing short of crazy why you can’t or won’t see that.

        I see you still don’t want to grasp that what you said was offensive. THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT. You don’t want to take ownership despite it being an obvious problem. It doesn’t matter what YOU intend it to be. IT MATTERS WHAT WAS SAID AND HOW IT WAS SAID. It was NOT educational. No one can learn from you calling what they’ve said names like an 6 year-old. That is demeaning and insulting in the real world.

        As long as I continue to stand firm and not give in to you, you will never quit, eh? Okay. I see how it is. I know neither Herneith nor Nat Turner’s Revenge will bow down to the likes of you when it’s clear you the one in the wrong and, for some reason psychology can’t explain, see nothing wrong with it. None of us will blow hot air into that incredibly inflated racist ego of yours. And yes, I consider you a racist. Cry me a river.

  8. Well, BW — am I free to comment — unhindered, and uncensored around your blog, as you are free to comment, absolutely unfettered* around mine?

    If not, then I overestimated you, and we will simply return to status quo ante.

    Best,

    — x

    * – Except for some basic rules of decorum that can be summed up in a simple phrase: componse your posts so that my young children can read them.

  9. Do you have a job? You seem to have a lot of time on your hands to post this bullshit!

    I posted the above on his blog. He will probably delete it as it contains a curse word in it. Hence I have posted it here before he does. Xpedia, discuss.

  10. Yep. I never censor anything in anyone’s posts if they keep it dignified and respectful. I have no problem with your questioning anything I say whatsoever, but it’s unacceptable, of course, to commit personal attacks, use dirty language or post racist slurs.

    I do censor those things, and, of course, would never do any of those things myself.

    I have a simple rule for you. Imagine my young son is reading what you are posting. Then go ahead and post.

    Best,

    — x

  11. Oh, and, yes, Herneith — your comment was really stupid. However, I did reply. In my reply, you’ll note that I commented on your posts, not on you.

    Best,

    — x

      1. That’s hardly a deep insight, BW… I’ve told you that’s how I do things only several dozen times now. 🙂

        Unlike you, I don’t censor or ban anyone anyone.

        Best,

        — x

      2. Who said it was, or have to be? You’ve never given deep insight to begin with. So, look who’s calling the kettle black? I hardly think anyone would think calling someone’s comment ‘stupid’ is critical.

  12. Just a quick reply…

    You said:
    You must really have a lot of time on your hands to write this, all just to get me to say ‘I’m sorry’ to you and rethink my stance on the whole racism thing. Wow.

    My reply;
    Nope. I type fast. Really fast. Remember: I’m trying to get you to say you’re sorry for your benefit. Not mine. I’ve already forgiven you… you need to be able to purge the evil and bitterness from your racist soul, and liberate your conscience.

    You said:
    Aside from the grammatical and spelling errors of my last response, you should know what I mean. If you really feel the need to point them out, you obviously are obsessed with trying to discount what I’ve said. I digress.

    My reply:
    I did figure what you were saying, but didn’t want to presume, so I took what you said at face value. It’s not my fault your post was littered with grammatical and spelling errors and, I might point out — the opposite freakin’ words from what you meant! 🙂 You really could stand to do some proof-reading from time-to-time, BW.

    You said:
    I already mentioned how you DID apologize for calling me a name. That was it. But since day one, YOU CAME TO MY BLOG.

    My reply;
    You put it out there for the whole world to see. If you’re too scared of opinions and views that challenge your own, then make your blog private. Of course, that would say something unpleasant about your own courage of your convictions.

    You said:
    How is apologizing to you a good thing for me? What should I apologize for? I didn’t start this sad little war. I didn’t comment on your blog first. You threw the first punch. I defended myself while you kept throwing more blows. It’s nothing short of crazy why you can’t or won’t see that.

    My reply:
    A sincere apology would be good for you, because you engaged in unwarranted abuse of first an innocent woman, then an innocent man, both of whom came to your blog and commented on what you put out there for the whole world to see, and invited the whole world to comment upon.

    You said:
    I see you still don’t want to grasp that what you said was offensive. THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT. You don’t want to take ownership despite it being an obvious problem. It doesn’t matter what YOU intend it to be. IT MATTERS WHAT WAS SAID AND HOW IT WAS SAID. It was NOT educational. No one can learn from you calling what they’ve said names like an 6 year-old. That is demeaning and insulting in the real world.

    My reply:
    What my colleague said to you in the beginning of all this was harsh and critical. Your post on Paula Deen was moronic and nonsensical, and she called you on it. There are very few kind words that could have pertained to the nitwittery of your original post. However, my colleague never called you names or impugned your character in any way. She criticized your dumb post. If you were offended, that’s your problem. If you were sure of what you wrote, then you should have had both the courage and the integrity to defend that, and not to attack my colleague personally.

    Then, when I joined the conversation later, you accused me of racism. So, really, that’s two apologies you owe us: one to my colleague and one to me. We’ll settle for just one.

    What my colleague said to you in the Paula Deen post, and what I’ve said to you here should have educated you. If you remain uneducated, that’s your fault.

    If you are offended by how my colleague and I said things, then you need to thicken your skin. You came at her and me a whole lot more viciously than anything we ever did.

    How the truth is expressed to you shouldn’t matter in the least, BW; only that it be the truth is what’s important. You need desperately to learn at least that, BW.

    You said;
    As long as I continue to stand firm and not give in to you, you will never quit, eh? Okay. I see how it is. I know neither Herneith nor Nat Turner’s Revenge will bow down to the likes of you when it’s clear you the one in the wrong and, for some reason psychology can’t explain, see nothing wrong with it. None of us will blow hot air into that incredibly inflated racist ego of yours. And yes, I consider you a racist. Cry me a river.

    My reply:
    No one is asking anyone to bow down to me, BW. And, of course, I’ve never called you any names whatsoever — except one time on my blog, after which I immediately apologized. Man, BW! You have more red herring dodges and excuses than anyone I’ve ever>/i> met!!!

    I have called you a racist, to which you have readily admitted yourself. So, I’ve only called you what you called yourself.

    I hope you recognize what you do so casually: (1) you try to explain away differences between you and me as resulting because, you say, I’m crazy. (2) you criticize me for being tenacious, when you have been just as tenacious. (3) You accuse me of calling you names, yet I never have. (4) You used to accuse me of saying that there was no such thing as white racism! Thank goodness you’ve abandoned that canard!

    You’ll note that I have never, ever, not ever, not even once called you stupid (except on my own blog, where I immediately apologized), or crazy, or a liar, or anything but a racist; a disorder to which you readily admit.

    I’ve never even called you an egotist! Yet you indulge in that kind of perfectly irrelevant personal attack as if it were second nature for you. You really need to explore that in your own character, BW.

    If you were forced to eliminate all personal attacks, name-calling and other irrelevant splutterings and dodges, would you have anything to put in a riposte to me?

    I don’t think so.

    Best,

    — x

    1. You know what? I’m not going to waste my time rebutting every single sentence like you do. Instead, I’m just going to say for the last and final time that I will NOT apologize to you, and you will NOT make me apologize to you. There is NOTHING you can say or do to make me give into your deluded, online white paternalistic obsession with me. Period. YOU made the choice to come to my blog. And YOU made the choice to comment on my blog. All in all, YOU STARTED THIS. DEAL WITH IT.

  13. @BW… I have simply represented an opportunity for you finally to grow beyond your omphaloskepsistic mewling, and to stop scrabbling for excuses. That you choose to forego that gift is your loss.

    For my own part, I couldn’t care less whether you apologize to me or not, but you should do it for the betterment of your own character.

    BW, you live today in an era when the overwhelming default state-of-mind of white people toward black people, is a combination of contrition, charity, pity, love, and a deeply, fervently held wish that all black people live in peace, prosperity, brotherhood, good health and happiness. Wow! Some oppressor that is!

    Why, on earth, BW, do you think that “People of Color” are scrabbling desperately, risking life and limb, leaving family and home behind, to get in here? There’s no movement anywhere of anyone struggling desperately to get out of America, BW; they’re all trying to get in!

    Yet, all that you and your nitwit friends like Abagond, Nat, Herneith and “diary” can see is imaginary snarling, sneering, barely concealed contempt bordering on hatred coming from whites. It’s really a shame.

    Look, if America even remotely resembled what you say she does, don’t you think that you could point me to thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of racial incidents all across the land, all the time?

    Again, to put it into some perspective, if there were even one hundred freakin’ thousand newsworthy white-on-black racial incidents in this country in a given year (there aren’t — there might be a few dozen), and assuming that they were each committed by a different white dude, that would mean that for every serious white racist out there, there would also be nearly two-freakin’ thousand non-racist whites.

    It’s pretty obvious that whatever white racists remain in America today, they’re vastly outnumbered by good, decent, upstanding normal white people, BW. And white racism — at least as imagined by you in the Race Grievance Industry — was utterly defeated decades ago. That you continue to hear echoes of it, means simply that you’re really just … get ready for it: Hearing echoes. You’re imagining it, BW.

    All you do is constantly point us all to an incident here, and another incident there, and still another incident over there, hoping against hope that these isolated incidents — all while a bloodbath of black-on-black carnage rages on unabated in the big cities — will somehow distract everyone and prove that white racism is all over the place.

    Yeah. Uhhhh… I guess not.

    BW, you were so desperate for white violence against blacks that you even turned the Hispanic George Zimmerman into a white dude to support your increasingly far-fetched narrative.

    I’m reading between the lines here, BW, but I’m thinking that your bitterness comes from some past failing on your part for which you’d like to have a scapegoat. I’m thinking that you need an excuse for that past failing and that white people have been obligingly providing you with that excuse for a very long time now.

    Since, for decades now, white people have been simply rolling over while the RGI has blamed them for every single problem black people have ever had, it’s pretty obvious where you would look first.

    I did try, BW, to give you an opportunity to grow and mature. I expect less from Nat and Herneith, and “diary,” but they are likely simply stupid. I don’t, and can’t, know. There are stupid people out there, BW, and there are — sit down for this one — stupid black people out there too. Nat, Herneith and “diary” are likely the racists that they are because there’s just not a lot of activity between their ears.

    You, however, have no excuse, except for the selective stupidity I mentioned above.

    Why don’t you choose to abandon that selective stupidity and improve your life? It can’t be fun carrying around all that unfounded bitterness all the time. Why can’t you simply recognize what’s obvious to anyone with any gray matter whatsoever between their ears: all races are filled to the brim with every imaginable kind of person. All in all, over the course of time, it’s simply true that no race is smarter, nicer, harder-working, more creative, more artistic, benevolent, more ingenious… better — than any other race. Every race has its saints and its scoundrels, its morons and geniuses, its greats and its awfuls, and, again over the course of history, in roughly equal measure. For every slaughter of the Jews there’s a Rwanda, or a Turkish massacre of Armenians, or the Chinese wholesale liquidation of tens of millions of Chinese that stopped only in 1976! And, yes, BW, for every white slaver who went to Africa, there was a black man selling him his own brother black man. You can try to excuse that away all you want, but it doesn’t make it any less true. Yeah, you want psychosis? You can find it in every race. You want profound, soul-lifting nobility? You can find thatin every race. You want incomprehensible cruelty? Or unfathomable selflessness? Yep. Every race has it. Every race does it. And, again, over the course of all history, in roughly equal measure.

    Why? Simple. Because they’re not black, or white, or yellow, or red or whatever… they’re human, BW. They’re nothing more — nor one iota less — than that. They’re all filled with the full measure of divinely good and infernally bad, and all points in-between, no matter what the color of their skin is.

    The sooner you liberate yourself from all the mental contortions, the tortured intellectualization, the twisted, convoluted reasoning and the phantasmagorical twaddle(*) of the RGI, the healthier and saner you’ll be.

    That is the truth, BW, and you know it. You need to learn to deal with it.

    Your friend,

    — x

    (*) – Yes, I’m thinking of “Dr.” Llaila Afrika and his wacky ilk. 🙂

    1. I see what you’re game is. You want to push my buttons because you get such a high out of it. Like I said, you want to feel superior to me. That’s why you constantly want me to give in to you and apologize. But it won’t work. Like I’ve said a million times, I will not apologize to you. If anything, you need to apologize to me and my guests. But, I know I wouldn’t hold my breath. You see nothing to apologize for. And yet, you’re hooked on wanting me bow down to you.

      Here’s how I see how you operate. Since you don’t believe that racism against my people is an important matter, you use words like ‘stupid’ to describe any and all statements that actually address racism. You think doing so is the same as teaching someone something. But when people, rightfully so, respond addressing how offended they are and lash back at you, you play the victim – yes, you do. You try to deflect any personal accountability for the offensive and condescending things you’ve said to me and others, and you send them on a guilt trip wanting them to apologize to you.

      You will try to mix this around and say how you’re not any of those things, which is another thing you love to do, but I’m not as dumb as you think I am. So, don’t trick me and don’t try.

      Prae, I’m going to tell you once and for all that I don’t need you telling me what my reality is. I think anyone who engages in that is full of themselves. Prae, you are so full, you’re throwing up nonsense. And you’re too sick to see what’s wrong with it. You are so sick, you think you’re in the right.

      The reality of one group is not the same as the reality of another. What black people go through in America and other white dominated nations has never been something white people, as a whole, can or would understand. When was the last time white people, in general, have been right about the realities of black people which include their struggles, interests, thoughts, etc.? Never. So, what makes you think you are some lighthouse in the sea of misguidance?

      If you don’t care whether I apologize or not, why do you keep coming here talking about it? That’s another thing you have a habit of doing, talking from both sides of your mouth i.e. say one thing and say another that contradicts it. So, if you’re done with this urge to have me say ‘I’m sorry’, shut up about it already. Or are you so full of pride that you can’t concede?

      You continue to live in your own little fantasy world where oppression against blacks is either minimal or nonexistent, but like I said, white people have never been right about black people. I will say that there are white people who are indeed generous and loving, but from what is seen from the eyes of POC, many of them are still lost in whiteness, and one of them is YOU! You are high on whiteness, and it looks like you will never cease your addiction.

      I know that in the end, you will continue to put yourself on a pedestal and portray me out to be some lost soul who hates white people for being white while you see yourself as some benevolent white savior. I know the score more so than you give me credit for. But Prae, I’m honestly tired of this. Nothing you’re saying is convincing enough to make me think twice for even a microsecond. All you’re giving me is, “Listen to me because I say so” kind of talk. It doesn’t fly with me.

      You haven’t given me a reason why I should reconsider my thinking. None. Why should I believe a total stranger from the net whom I will never meet in real life? Why should I believe, let alone respect, someone who comes down on whatever I say like I was some child? Why should I continue talking to someone who obviously is racist. And why should I believe someone so sensitive when I call him out.

      I really don’t think you are part of some “think tank”. If you are, that’s just another form of proof that you are crazy. Why would a think tank worry about me, an average blogger? You study me as if I’m in charge of what you call the race grievance industry. I’m not. There’s no such thing. That’s something crazy conservatives like you came up with to cover up actual racism, defend it and try to soothe whatever latent shame you have yearning for the days where my people are seen as inferior and you don’t feel bad about it. It’s written all over your words.

      I am not a child. I am not inferior. And I am damn sure not your slave, Prae. So, you can take your white master paternalism and shove it. I’m done. Consider this my emancipation from your useless campaign. From here on out, you are no longer welcome back in here. Call it a victory, as I know you would, but I’m not in this to win anything. I’m in this to tell MY story. And you don’t want to hear it. Instead, you use your articles to take my stories and tear them down as if they’re ramblings from an immature child.

      I’m in this to learn and listen to other people who have their own stories. I don’t call other people’s stories ‘stupid’ or ‘insane’. I don’t talk down to them just because I have a different opinion. I listen and take it in. I learn to keep quiet. I don’t criticize or insult, especially if it doesn’t call for it. That is why I’m more ADULT, more MATURE and more HUMAN than you will EVER be! PERIOD!

      Prae, your story has been told countless times. That’s why I’m sick of it. That’s why other people are sick of it. So, that’s why I’m closing the chapter on this nonargument. But I know you won’t as you will copy, paste and rip apart another one of my articles. Your obsession with me will continue.

      By the way, we are NOT friends. You are now BANNED!

      1. Just a quick reply…

        Coming from him that’s hilarious! If he calls his long drawn out nonsensical posts a quick reply, I’d hate to see what an average post is like! P.S., I spat out my juice whan I read his post. Folks, don’t read goofy posts whilst partaking of a beverage!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s